[Kronos1965]

Can someone summarize the issue?

Is she engaging in State business allegedly using a private email or is she a private citizen discussing private matters.

I know I know, nothing on the Internet is truly private but what point would be served if in her private emails she said something that contradicts a public position?

She has clearly stated that she may have values in private that she does not champion in public or has public positions that she takes that she does not hold personally.

Her actions should speak louder than her words.

Now if she is engaging in business as a way to avoid public scrutiny AND there is evidence (beyond hacking which I am against), then that could be a problem IMHO.

Any thoughts?