View Single Post
Old 11-24-2004, 10:40 AM   #63 (permalink)
pluckyew
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
pluckyew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berkeley, NorCal
Posts: 677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bayou Titan is absolutely correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayou Titan
I know this is a controversial statement but shooting someone in the back, as bad as it sounds, is sometimes justified. For instance, if I had a gun and saw someone shooting innocent people at random with an assault rifle, I wouldn't hesitate to shoot that person in the back to prevent further loss of life. I'm not saying that's what happened in this case but just using an example.

It will be interesting to see how the Wisconsin incident turns out once all the facts are in. So far, it doesn't look good for the guy that is arrested.
Bayou Titan is absolutely correct.

Matter of fact, it would be the smart and couragous way to stop a felony in progress.

The trouble with that WI hunter is that why did he chase them down then shoot 'em in the back?
__________________
Twenty Aught Four Titan KC 4x4 SE, Smoke: Off-Road/Big-Tow/Utility/Bench 6-seater.

"The state that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards, and its fighting by fools," Thucydides.

Last edited by pluckyew; 11-24-2004 at 10:44 AM.
pluckyew is offline   Reply With Quote