Science vs. Religion

[DeadRiver]

proof of de-evolution..

take a human skeletol system from 200 years ago and set it beside a modern day human skeletol system. if you pick figures of equal height and weight you will notice something.... bone density. past man really had to put his back into his job, modern man, well a lot of us sit behind computers. examine this for yourself....

Not starting a God war, but I found this very interesting.

[TitanBlue]

GMVisitor, very interesting input, thank you!

[DeadRiver]

my uncle also pointed me here: http://www.answersingenesis.org/

i always have questions and he's pretty cool about entertaining them

[LittleRam]

Originally Posted by DeadRiver

my uncle also pointed me here: http://www.answersingenesis.org/

i always have questions and he's pretty cool about entertaining them

pretty nice site. Thanks for the link.

[GMVisitor]

Originally Posted by TitanBlue

GMVisitor, very interesting input, thank you!

Your welcome TitanBlue! I won't argue with anyone about my religious beliefs but I will share them if asked. I respect everyone's point of view and our right to make our own decisions.

[dirtyd]

This is actually westondean on my old account home from college. Thanks to the few who agreed with me, the world would be a better place if everyone could think that way. Back to the main reason of the site though...... I tried some E85 in the Titan and it is junk. I noticed horrible MPG drops, but not much difference in power.

[albonismo]

Originally Posted by dirtyd

This is actually westondean on my old account home from college. Thanks to the few who agreed with me, the world would be a better place if everyone could think that way. Back to the main reason of the site though...... I tried some E85 in the Titan and it is junk. I noticed horrible MPG drops, but not much difference in power.

yeah E85 is the worst development in alternative fuel ever...anyways, science vs religion. religion always wins. period.

[SKEET]

Originally Posted by GMVisitor

If evolution is basically proven then how do you explain the following:


"NOT ONE CHANGE OF SPECIES INTO ANOTHER IS ON RECORD. We cannot
prove that a single species has ever changed."
- Charles Darwin

The human body (or the body of any other creature) cannot live
without most internal organs, such as the heart, the lungs, the liver,
et cetera. Remove any of these organs, and the specimen dies. This
implies that the entire body was created at one point in time.

Natural selection cannot produce new genes; it only selects among
preexisting characteristics.

According to ALL theories on the evolution of the solar system:

a. The planets should all rotate on their axes in the
same direction; Venus and Uranus rotate `backwards`.

b. All 42 moons of the various planets should revolve in
the same direction; at least 11 revolve `backwards`.

c. The orbits of these 42 moons should all lie in the equatorial
plane of the planet they orbit; many, including the earth's moon,
are highly inclined.

Human footprints are found alongside dinosaur footprints in the rock
formations of the Paluxy riverbed in Texas. This obviously shows that
man and dinosaurs lived at the same time and the same place. But
evolutionists claim that dinosaurs became extinct about 30 million years
before `man` supposedly began to `evolve`.

MANY DATING TECHNIQUES SHOW THE EARTH AND SOLAR
SYSTEM TO BE YOUNG

1. Direct measurements of the earth's magnetic field over the past 140
years show a steady and rapid decline in its strength. This decay
pattern is consistent with the theoretical view that there is an
electrical current inside the earth which produces the magnetic field.
If this view is correct, then 25,000 years ago the electrical current
would have been so vast that the earth's structure could not have
survived the heat produced. This would imply that the earth could not be
older than 25,000 years.

2. The atmosphere has less than 40,000 years worth of helium, based on
just the production of helium from the decay of uranium and thorium.
There is no known means by which large amounts of helium can escape from
the atmosphere. The atmosphere appears to be young.

3. The rate at which elements such as copper, gold, tin, lead, silicon,
mercury, uranium and nickel are entering the oceans is very rapid when
compared with the small quantities of these elements already in the
oceans. Therefore, the oceans must be very much younger than a million
years.

4. Evolutionists believe that the continents have existed for at least
1 billion years. However, the continents are being eroded at a rate
that would have leveled them in a relatively short 14 million years.

Since 1836, over one hundred different observers at the Royal
Greenwich Observatory and U.S. Naval Observatory have made direct visual
measurements which show that the diameter of the sun is shrinking at a
rate of about .1% each century or about 5 feet per hour! Furthermore,
records of solar eclipses indicate that this rapid shrinkage has been
going on for at least the past 400 years. Several indirect techniques
also confirm this gravitational collapse, although these inferred
collapse rates are only about 1/7th as much. Using the most
conservative data, one must conclude that had the sun existed one
million years ago, it would have been so large that it would have heated
the earth so much that life could not have survived. Yet, evolutionists
say that a million years ago all the present forms of life were
essentially as they are now, having completed their `evolution` that
began 200 million years ago.

If man and languages `evolved`, the earliest languages should be the
simplest. On the contrary, as one studies languages that are
increasingly ancient, such as Latin (200 B.C.), Greek (800 B.C.), and
Vedic Sanskrit (1500 B.C.), they become INCREASINGLY COMPLEX with
respect to syntax, cases, genders, moods, voices, tenses, and verb
forms. The evidence indicates that languages do not Evolve, they
DEvolve.

Just a few things to think about

There's a place in the bible that tells of how the earth spins like someone making pottery but how long was it after that was written that people believed the earth to be flat and not round.Either way people decide to think of the bible to be hog wash without even reading it.That's what God calls free will by the way.

[SKEET]

Originally Posted by GMVisitor

[/b]


They might have been:

In Job 40:15-24, God describes to Job (who lived after the Flood) a great beast with which Job was familiar. This great animal, called 'behemoth,' is described as 'the chief of the ways of God,' perhaps the biggest land animal God had created. Impressively, he moved his tail like a CEDAR TREE! Although some Bible translations say this may have been an elephant or hippopotamus, the description actually fits that of a dinosaur like Brachiosaurus. Elephants and hippos do not have tails like cedar trees!

\"Look at the behemoth, which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. What strength he has in his loins, what power in the muscles of his belly! His tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are close-knit. His bones are tubes of bronze, his limbs like rods of iron. He ranks first among the works of God.\" - Job 40:15-19 (NIV translation)

The human body (or the body of any other creature) cannot live
without most internal organs, such as the heart, the lungs, the liver,
et cetera. Remove any of these organs, and the specimen dies. This
implies that the entire body was created at one point in time.Scientist will agree that this is a fact and then turn around and try to explain how it might of happened another way.Lol

[matthews]

[chunko]

Originally Posted by matthews

I was outta town so it's a little late but I nominate post of the day!

[matthews]

Originally Posted by adavis99

I was outta town so it's a little late but I nominate post of the day!

Crap I'd forgotten I even posted it!

[DiabloDelSol]

Besides me, are there any other Satan worshippers on Titan Talk? Maybe we can sacrifice a virgin together. Also does anyone know where I can get some fresh baby's blood?

[kman]

interesting schematic mathews.

do you guys interpret the one on the left as being the old adage about education... "the more you know or learn the more you realize about how much more there is to know and learn" and the one on the right as "ignorance is bliss".

[Seranin]

Originally Posted by kman

interesting schematic mathews.

do you guys interpret the one on the left as being the old adage about education... "the more you know or learn the more you realize about how much more there is to know and learn" and the one on the right as "ignorance is bliss".

of course. You'll note that there is no "End" on the left flow chart.

Originally Posted by matthews

Crap I'd forgotten I even posted it!

I think your lady in your avatar lends credit to both sides of the discussion... a stellar example of evolution and/or "god's" craftsmanship at its finest