Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VShortt
The power down low can be mostly attibuted to the fact that they are equipped with a five speed transmission.
|
Actually, that's not correct. The transmission really doesn't have anything to do with the total TQ output of a particular engine. The two most important factors in TQ output are attributed to the displacement size of the motor and the intake manifold runner design in naturally aspirated engines.
That's why the new Chevy Vortec 5.3L has 320hp but only a measly 335lb.ft of torque. VVT or VCT helps to keep the TQ level flatter which increases HP. However, the maximum amount of TQ that can be derived from 5.3 liters will always be less than a similar engine of larger displacement.
The intake manifold runner design is the second most important factor in torque output of a particular engine. Look at the old TPI engines from GM. Long runners that were almost 17" long. Good for TQ, but bad for HP. Those engines typically ran out of breath up top making for a rather low HP high TQ rated engine. Since the 5.6L Endurance has been designed with towing in mind, the intake manifold is probably designed with relatively long intake runners which move air faster at low rpms creating a higher TQ peak than a shorter intake runner would. Shorter intake runners would tend to stagnate the air flow at low rpms (less peak TQ) but would flow much better at higher rpms increasing peak HP.
Variable cam timing helps to bridge this gap by creating a much flatter TQ curve throughout the rpm range. More TQ and more HP. The best of both worlds. However, I'd like to see Nissan use VCT on the exhaust side as well to pump up the numbers on the Endurance even further.
