Nissan Titan Forum Left Header Nissan Titan Forums Right Header
Go Back   Nissan Titan Forum > Titan Discussion > Titan General Discussion

Titan General Discussion General Discussion about the Nissan Titan.

   
       

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-07-2004, 07:29 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Renaissance Festival, TX
Posts: 256
Send a message via AIM to Steve04SE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Steve04SE
Paging Juma; RE: Timing Advance vs. Fuel Grade

I've been off the forum for a couple months and after doing a search for the subject and reading the posts, I'm wondering if you arrived at a definitive answer as to whether using 89 or 93 octance allows more timing advance, hence, more power.
When you first posted about this a few months back I was very skeptical; however, I swear my SOP dyno tells me the Titan accelerates better with 89 fuel. I gotta know how your empirical data compares to my arse.
__________________

---------------------------------------------------
'04 SE, Radiant Silver, RF Bench Opt., Chrome 20" REACTION wheels & Billet Grill
MODS:
K&N AirCharger, Sirius, Flowmaster 70 w/ dual out
PERFORMANCE:
Stock: 273 rwhp @ 5000 rpm, 339 rwtq @ 3300 rpm
w/Mods: 293 rwhp @ 5000, 357 rwtq @ 3900 rpm
Link to Dyno
Steve04SE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 08:44 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
pciley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perris, CA
Posts: 1,496
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not sure how long you were gone, but this was back in late July. He used a computer to find out that higher octane DOES advane the timing. Your ARSE is off!

testing timing advance
__________________
KC XE Smoke
pciley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 08:51 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 787
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yeah, I'm convinced it does. my run up to new york didn't add any data to the timing advance because there were nothing but hills, but, I did get a solid 1-1.5 mpg better mileage with 89. to do that, it would have to advance a little to generate more torque and with 89 it could. juma
juma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply






Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM.


  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.


SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0