Nissan Titan Forum Left Header Nissan Titan Forums Right Header
Go Back   Nissan Titan Forum > Titan Discussion > Titan Performance Modifications

Titan Performance Modifications Install a new part and cant wait to tell us about it? Great! We'd love to hear about it in here.

   
       

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-14-2004, 03:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dual Exhaust Confiuration Differences

As I read through the posts (both past and present) concerning dual exhaust, I notice that most everyone uses a single muffler configuration either a single in/dual out with a y-pipe or a dual in dual out. My truck has an independent pipe and muffler for each manifold. I am using 2 Flowmaster 40 series mufflers and 2” pipe. The guy at the custom exhaust shop where I had my truck done at referred to this as a true dual, and cautioned against using anything much bigger than 2” pipe in this config saying it could start to decrease low end torque. He charged the same for this configuration as for a single muffler, so by the time I paid for the dual and my 3” stainless steel tips, I was out the door for about $400. I love the sound, and the performance seems fine, but after seeing how many people are using the single muffler configurations, I am just curious as to whether there is some big disadvantage to using the “true dual” configuration. How do the different configurations compare in HP gains and sound? Thanks in advance for any insight you can give.
__________________
TITANUP04
2006 LE Black CC
4X4 Off Road
Big Tow Pkg
TITANUP04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 04:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Nissan Titan Status - Premium Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Sammy Sandbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 6,019
Send a message via ICQ to Sammy Sandbag Send a message via AIM to Sammy Sandbag
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to Sammy Sandbag Send a message via AIM to Sammy Sandbag
I would have liked to go true dual, but that would have tacked on at least another $100 for very minimal improvements in performance, if any. Looks like you got a great deal, I'd like to see some picts and hear some sound bytes. BTW, you aren't the first with this set-up. I don't recall the name, but a TitanTalk member has a similar set up.
__________________
-Counsel Yourself

2004 Nissan Smoke Titan LE 2WD
Sammy Sandbag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 04:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
smoketitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CALI
Posts: 2,213
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wow you got a great deal on a true dual set up. I would think the true dual would be better
smoketitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 07:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MA, 01985
Posts: 234
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The factory pipe is 3" dia (7.069 sq-in)
How did the mechanic justify reducing the combined cross sectional area of the pipe by 11% (6.283 sq-in)?
With big name cat-backs offering 2.5" dia dual pipes, I would have expected twin 2.25" dia pipes appropriate for a more free-flowing system without causing drone-resonance issues or loss in torque.
Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 08:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
GETSOMZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Got any pics of the install? I would think the true duals would give the best performance out of all the combinations. This is the route I will go it I ever get around to upgrading my exhaust.

I would think a 2.25-2.5 would be the ideal pipes to use for a dual setup, though at these power levels a 2" pipe may work just as well. Only one way to tell...dyno it!
__________________
Scott
2004 White Titan SE CrewCab 4x4 - (SOLD)
2002 SOM Z28 - For haulin' arse
GETSOMZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 09:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
hawkeye680's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Savannah Area
Posts: 275
Send a message via AIM to hawkeye680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to hawkeye680
I think you are thinking of "Kevin" Sammy.
__________________
Galaxy Black KC XE 4X4
hawkeye680 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 09:51 PM   #7 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Nissan Titan Status - Premium Member
iTrader: (0)
 
pagerdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake City, Tennessee
Posts: 3,254
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy sandbag
I don't recall the name, but a TitanTalk member has a similar set up.
Could you per chance be referring to mine, Mr. ...., uh, what was your
name again, was it Sammy? Kevin posted pics of a true dual also, with
a different brand of muffler.

Here's mine:

Flowmaster Dual Pipes
__________________
Steve

pagerdaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2004, 07:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Bay, CA
Posts: 55
Send a message via AIM to LikeaRock14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to LikeaRock14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
The factory pipe is 3" dia (7.069 sq-in)
How did the mechanic justify reducing the combined cross sectional area of the pipe by 11% (6.283 sq-in)?
With big name cat-backs offering 2.5" dia dual pipes, I would have expected twin 2.25" dia pipes appropriate for a more free-flowing system without causing drone-resonance issues or loss in torque.
Although IMO 2" is a bit small even for a V8, remember that you're also replacing the stock 55 gallon drum of a muffler w/ a much freer flowing one. It's not just pipe size alone that helps you unleash potential power, the muffler has a lot to do with it too obviously. I/e scavenging effects, chambered/strraight through, etc. Bigger isn't always better. It's more important to use the correct pipe diameter while retaining decent exhaust velocity throughout
Too large a pipe diameter, the velocity of the exhaust won't be able to flow effieciently (in a matter of words, due to the extra flow space), and ytou can let a certain amount of abckpressure back up your exhaust.

Although I do agree, 2.25" is the ideal system IMO for any engine under 350 hp., or in some applications it can differ. 2.25" retains maximum flow capability while not going too small to make the exhaust rap and pop a bit more.
__________________
Dolan

00 Chevy 3500 Crew Cab LS, 7.4 ltr 4:10 rear. 70 series Flowmaster Exhaust, K&N FIPK, JET Chip, Drop in liner, Capitol Radial 265/75's
91 S Series Blazer, 4.3 liter 4WD Auto. Minor Engine mods, Spin Tech Exhaust
LikeaRock14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2004, 08:02 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 786
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
The factory pipe is 3" dia (7.069 sq-in)
How did the mechanic justify reducing the combined cross sectional area of the pipe by 11% (6.283 sq-in)?
With big name cat-backs offering 2.5" dia dual pipes, I would have expected twin 2.25" dia pipes appropriate for a more free-flowing system without causing drone-resonance issues or loss in torque.
where it counts the most, between the Y and the Muff, the stocker is 2.5 inch. the 3 inch tailpipe doesn't matter as much because the exhaust gas has cooled and reduced volume by then. the actual matchup is 4.9 square inches with the 2.5 inch single versus the 6.28 square inch of the dual 2 inch. I've seen these work fine in the past. I would have added a x-crossover and this would be pretty close to optimal for keeping exhaust velocity up. Another thing that would have been a plus is to have the second cat/resonator replaced with a 2.5 inch or 3 inch pipe its entire length as some are doing now. that would have made a nice long collector, similar to those on headers and provided a lot of carrying capacity for a high volume part of the exhaust. juma
juma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2004, 09:55 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
The factory pipe is 3" dia (7.069 sq-in)
How did the mechanic justify reducing the combined cross sectional area of the pipe by 11% (6.283 sq-in)?
With big name cat-backs offering 2.5" dia dual pipes, I would have expected twin 2.25" dia pipes appropriate for a more free-flowing system without causing drone-resonance issues or loss in torque.


I guess the thought behind the 2” exhaust on the true dual as it was explained to me, goes like this: on the stock Titan, you have exhaust from 8 cylinders ending up in one pipeand flowing through one muffler. Once the true dual is in place, each pipe is only handling exhaust from four cylinders, so you don’t require as big a diameter. Truth be told, he probably just had more 2” pipe in the shop than anything else. The more I research this, the more I think that once you get to a 2” diameter pipe, anything bigger is just a matter of preference. I think that unless you are drag racing, the differences are pretty minimal. Just to see where I am at, I am going to try to get the truck on a dyno in the next couple weeks. I will post the results when I get them.
__________________
TITANUP04
2006 LE Black CC
4X4 Off Road
Big Tow Pkg
TITANUP04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2004, 10:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 786
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TITANUP04
I guess the thought behind the 2” exhaust on the true dual as it was explained to me, goes like this: on the stock Titan, you have exhaust from 8 cylinders ending up in one pipeand flowing through one muffler. Once the true dual is in place, each pipe is only handling exhaust from four cylinders, so you don’t require as big a diameter. Truth be told, he probably just had more 2” pipe in the shop than anything else. The more I research this, the more I think that once you get to a 2” diameter pipe, anything bigger is just a matter of preference. I think that unless you are drag racing, the differences are pretty minimal. Just to see where I am at, I am going to try to get the truck on a dyno in the next couple weeks. I will post the results when I get them.
the kicker is that on every other revolution you have two cylinders firing on one side and near the same time. This makes one side have more backpressure and slows your acceleration time. furthermore, the side is usually the driver's side and you have a long exhaust pipe to pump through. this is why a H- pipe or X-pipe crossover get you more power because it allows that temporary overpressure in one side to bleed off to the other exhaust pipe. juma
juma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply






Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 PM.


  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.


SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0