|
Re: Titan vs Third Gen Camaro
It was rated at something like 330HP for the SS and the Z28 (non-ram air and quieter muffler) was rated at 305, but there is actually a negligible difference between the two because the Ram-air on the SS is hardly worth anything although it looks cool. Ramming would be worth a mild form of supercharging if you were going close to 200MPH.
The "standard" LS1 was officially rated at 305HP @ 5200RPM and 335 Ft-lb @ 4000 but in this Hot Rod article put 292.8HP @5400 and 307.5 Ft-lb at 4400 RPM to the rear-wheel dyno roller, so accounting for losses through the drivetrain, it makes substantially more than it is rated for. The SS was rated about 20 to 25HP more, but almost no more torque, which is what you're really interested in. Since the Corvette is rated higher than the Camaro SS yet, in this example made slightly less than the Firebird, I think you have your answer whether SS or not.
Either way, the LS1s were underrated (in Camaros/Firebirds)whether SS or not. In the 1998 issue of "Hot Rod" magazine they rear-wheel dyno'd a bunch of cars. The 1998 Firebird Formula (rated at 305HP) put 292 HP to the ground. The Corvette (rated at 350HP) put 285. Close enough to tell you that the ratings are merely a game, and that a 305HP LS1 is pretty much the same as a 330HP or 350HP rated one.
As a point of reference, the Ford Mustang Cobra of the same time was a 4.6L DOHC 32-valve motor that was also rated at 305 HP but put out a lowly 256 on the rear-wheel dyno.
Three points: (1) LS1 (and derivatives of this engine) are awesome, and all likely make about 350 HP at the crankshaft. (2) HP figures are pretty much a ratings game (3) Each "Ford horsepower" is definitely not equivalent to a "Chevy horsepower", at least not at the time.
As for you and your Dad, it will depend upon launch and I will give him the nod...
__________________
If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. -- Will Rogers
|