with a oil filter replacement every 2500. Am I doing any of this too often or not enough? I use the 5/30 (regular) mobil 1 w/ nissans filter. At 7.50 a filter should I be going w/aftermarket?
:upsidedowThis is an old question that will prove people have a wide view of opinions
Just a question but don't diesel engines tend to run cooler than gasoline engines and if so, is that not a factor in when the lubricant will finally break down?For example: There are some over-the-road, long-distance trucks on the highway that have not had an oil change in over 400,000 miles. Yes....four hundred thousand miles. Filters are changed on a regular basis, and periodically, an oil analysis is performed to make sure the oil still possesses appropriate lubricating characteristics and viable additives.
I follow this exact procedure, even down to where I buy my filters. For me, it is really easy and cheap insurance, plus considering that my truck only sees 8500 miles a year, my oil usually lasts 7 months between changes.Dorsey said:I'm with you on the oil change - Mobil 1 at 5000 mile intervals. Makes it easy to remember when to change it. I think the filter every 2500 miles is overkill. I change it with the oil every 5000 miles. I use the OEM filters from courtesy.
Not to jump off topic here, but our re-useable spaceship is a disaster without even taking the questionable government oversight and behavior into account.nmanley said:Let's see we quit sending man to the moon over 30 years ago because it was too easy and nothing to gain. Now we have a reusable space ship that performs great when people with scruples don't let government cost cut the wrong programs.
Thanks for the info. I've also see comparos that put Mobil1 ahead of all others like Amsoil and Redline. But you have to be real careful as to exactly WHO is doing these tests. I can't imagine much, if any, difference between good synthetics. However, as I stated earlier, I use it more for the no gunking/coking properties than anything else. Any good synthetic should accomplish this as well.12glocks said:Hudson Vally Titan:
I used to use Mobil 1 in everything. I have started using Penzoil Platinum now. I have seen some head to heads with Mobil 1 (oil analysis in the same vehicle) where Pensoil Platinum exibited lower wear. It's what I am using now. I will do a OA on it at 5k and see how it performed. It's about $8 cheaper per change. Then I will do another OA before the truck goes of warrenty. I think our 5.6 engines are very well built compared to say, the big 3 offerings. Like I mentioned, the 20 bucks with give me the data to see if there is a problem or if I need to dump my verhicle. I highly doubt either scenario but you never know.
Now there is nothing wrong with Mobil 1 either. Like a lot of products in this world they have the name brand so they can sell for higher. I would not blame you for sticking with Mobil 1. I think Pensoil Platinum is one of the sleeper synthetics out there.
Like I mentioned before. Most of the oil is outstanding today compared to years ago.
Timster13 said:Not to jump off topic here, but our re-useable spaceship is a disaster without even taking the questionable government oversight and behavior into account.
Originally the Space Shuttle was designed to reduce the cost to space by using reuasable components. In the end it turns out that the amount of maintenance and upkeep far outpace the re-usability. A single Space Shuttle launch costs many times of what an Apollo era launch cost even when cost increases and adjustments for inflation are taken into account. And this was long before the additional restrictions that were imposed on NASA due to the Columbia accident. Also, the Shuttle is not capable of anything other than low Earth orbit.
Don't get me wrong, I love the Space Progarm and I think the Shuttle is cool, but the entire program has failed miserably when compared against it's original objectives. Never mind the fact that we lost 2 of them in service (Space flight is a dangerous business), but if NASA were to strictly follow the recommendations of the Columbia Accident Investiagtion Board, the usefullness of the Shuttle is reduced to almost zero (with the exception of servicing the International Space Station - another government lark with no clear mission or objective).
BTW, the new designs of spacecraft for possible future missions to the Moon are all based upon the Apollo era hardware with upgraded electronics.
I do agree with you that oils are much better these days though.:cheers:
I have a different schedule, that nobody else has mentioned yet.nmanley said:This is an old question that will prove people have a wide view of opinions...