Joined
·
158 Posts
is it possible to run dual foxes in the front like u see on the chevys??
![]()
dual foxes
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
Joined
·
158 Posts
u guys are haters lol i think i learned my lesson there, no dual shocks then
Joined
·
408 Posts
theyre not haters, they just want functionality when they spend their money...theyre reasonable and gave you good adviceJonny Sock0 said:
Joined
·
6,345 Posts
other than image issues, I just don't see a purpose for dual or tri-shocks up front... our fronts aren't that heavy and with the properly valved coilovers, u shouldn't have any suspension issues... but if you have the $, then get'r done! oh yeah, and post those pics too, so we can really hate...
Joined
·
1,739 Posts
I'm so sick of seeing big Chevys and Fords with generically valved dual Fox 2.0s I could puke. :gay: That's a lot of money to spend on a suspension that doesn't work any better than stock. A single custom valved 2.5 will out perform that all day long.....
Joined
·
158 Posts
haha SDTitan1 has me convinced, kidding.. i just wanted to kno if it would look cool but apparentl not. coilover it is, anyone not like racerunner?
Joined
·
6,387 Posts
Dual frt shocks are "so 30 minutes ago" :muncher:
Suspension technolgy has advanced, except for the "Disco" crowd that holds the more bling is better mentality...Funny part is that real hard core rock crawlers and such have switched to long travel single shock suspension awhile ago, same with "mud whamping", no need for 3 shocks per wheel to make the suspension work...
Joined
·
158 Posts
i just like the look of having something under my front fender lol
maybe a fox wit a remote res?
maybe a fox wit a remote res?
Joined
·
1,898 Posts
Most trucks that run dual shocks are either torsion bar or leaf springs. Since you already have a "coilover" it makes sence to just use bigger 2.5" shocks and use the proper spring. We sell remote res. front coilovers, have for almost 2 years. I can make just about any remote res 2.5" coilover works on the front of a Titan too. But dual 2.0 would be a lot of work and $$ for no benift in performance over a single 2.5". Now getting a single 3" coilover would be nice.
Joined
·
158 Posts
i already have the 4" CST spindle, and i want to get my truck between 6 and 8 inches in the front and 2" less in the back, should i even use a coilover or just blocks? and what is this > :sex0rs:PrerunnerGreg said:
Joined
·
158 Posts
the DR's wont??
are they more expensive or something
i just want the prerunner look wit a low budget.
are they more expensive or something
i just want the prerunner look wit a low budget.
Joined
·
6,181 Posts
The price on PRGproducts.com is $1150 for DRE c.o. but I think the SAWs are around $100 or so less, but the PRG uppers A-arms, that the mid length SAWs require, are around $600, or $550 for TC brand.Jonny Sock0 said:
I think PRG now has a stock application SAW though that like the DRE, doesn't need an aftermarket UCA. It is probably a little cheaper than the DRE too.
Those are all 2.5" race quality c.o., but for around $700 there's the Radflo 2" diameter body c.o. which also will also improve your suspension as well as lift, and they are a few hundred cheaper.
Joined
·
158 Posts
thanks.
i think a fox would look pretty under there
i think a fox would look pretty under there
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
