Joined
·
6,128 Posts
I just got a new issue and they had their Truck/SUV of the Year contest...
A few words I found interesting, thought I'd share:
'The 5.6L in the Nissan feels strong off the line, with Ford and GM trucks you can feel that the engine is tuned to not go wide-open throttle right away, or to retard the timing for a few seconds; not so with the Nissan.'
'But for nearly $45,000 we expected more.'
'Whoever signed off on putting a powered subwoofer under the driver seat should seriously re-evaluate their position in automotive engineering. And the gauge cluster looks like a bad '82 Atari video game.'
'Especially compared to the new GM trucks, Nissan is falling badly behind in interior styling'
'The truck has always been pretty good around town, but the longer wheelbase, which should help tame unruly pavement, now makes it feel as bouncy as a Ram, thanks to it's heavier springs.'
By the numbers:
HP & Torque (spec)
Ram 5.7L: 345 & 375
F-150 5.4L: 300 & 365
Titan 5.6L: 317 & 385
Tundra 5.7L: 381 & 401
HP & Torque (dyno, rounded)
Ram 5.7L: 247 & 247
F-150 5.4L: 224 & 263
Titan 5.6L: 290 & 354
Tundra 5.7L: 300 & 326
*Armada dyno'd at 265HP & 319 ft.lbs
Further proof that 317 is way under-rated.
0-60 (sec)
Ram: 9.0
F-150: 9.2
Titan: 7.9
Tundra: 8.0
1/4 Mile ET (sec)
Ram: 16.8
F-150: 16.9
Titan: 16.2
Tundra: 16.4
Trap Speed (MPH)
Ram: 85.1
F-150: 83.1
Titan: 88.0
Tundra: 91.6
1/4 Mile ET Trailer (sec.)
Ram: 20.8
F-150: 20.6
Titan: 20.0
Tundra: 19.6
Trap Speed Trailer (MPH)
Ram: 63.5
F-150: 68.5
Titan: 65.4
Tundra: 66.9
MPG (actual)
Ram: 14.77
F-150: 13.56
Titan: 12.70
Tundra: 14.80
A few words I found interesting, thought I'd share:
'The 5.6L in the Nissan feels strong off the line, with Ford and GM trucks you can feel that the engine is tuned to not go wide-open throttle right away, or to retard the timing for a few seconds; not so with the Nissan.'
'But for nearly $45,000 we expected more.'
'Whoever signed off on putting a powered subwoofer under the driver seat should seriously re-evaluate their position in automotive engineering. And the gauge cluster looks like a bad '82 Atari video game.'
'Especially compared to the new GM trucks, Nissan is falling badly behind in interior styling'
'The truck has always been pretty good around town, but the longer wheelbase, which should help tame unruly pavement, now makes it feel as bouncy as a Ram, thanks to it's heavier springs.'
By the numbers:
HP & Torque (spec)
Ram 5.7L: 345 & 375
F-150 5.4L: 300 & 365
Titan 5.6L: 317 & 385
Tundra 5.7L: 381 & 401
HP & Torque (dyno, rounded)
Ram 5.7L: 247 & 247
F-150 5.4L: 224 & 263
Titan 5.6L: 290 & 354
Tundra 5.7L: 300 & 326
*Armada dyno'd at 265HP & 319 ft.lbs
Further proof that 317 is way under-rated.
0-60 (sec)
Ram: 9.0
F-150: 9.2
Titan: 7.9
Tundra: 8.0
1/4 Mile ET (sec)
Ram: 16.8
F-150: 16.9
Titan: 16.2
Tundra: 16.4
Trap Speed (MPH)
Ram: 85.1
F-150: 83.1
Titan: 88.0
Tundra: 91.6
1/4 Mile ET Trailer (sec.)
Ram: 20.8
F-150: 20.6
Titan: 20.0
Tundra: 19.6
Trap Speed Trailer (MPH)
Ram: 63.5
F-150: 68.5
Titan: 65.4
Tundra: 66.9
MPG (actual)
Ram: 14.77
F-150: 13.56
Titan: 12.70
Tundra: 14.80