TripleC said:
yes the x pipe with prochamber was one of the best. but i think it also depends on wot type of headers you put on it. i dont think the 2 engines are very comparable. (titan/mustang) plus i think your backpressure is goin to effect your trq more than HP? i could be mistaken.
i have heard different opinions on both sides of the fence. ive heard that lack of backpressure helps with HP and more backpressure helps with TRQ. and you might be more into trq for your titan if u plan on pulling anything.
from what i have read. it seems the Y pipe on the titan performs better.
The term backpressure has always bothered me.

There is no advantage to "backpressure". Backpressure is a result of friction losses, which cost horsepower. Period. The performance gains seen with smaller pipes are from the momentum of the gas downstream scavenging (or pulling or vacuuming or sucking) the exhaust gas from the upstream cylinders. The opposite of backpressure. I think what some call backpressure should actually be called velocity or momentum. Smaller pipes maintain the velocity of the exhaust gas higher which scavenges better. The smaller pipes also create more friction, or backpressure. But it is the momentum that scavenges the cylinders and is beneficial; not the friction losses or backpressure.
The benefits of smaller pipes are most noticable at low rpms, where torque predominates. At low rpms, the cylinders are being scavenged, but friction (backpressure) is not much of a factor yet. As rpms rise, friction and backpressure rise as the square of the velocity (rpm). So at some engine speed, the friction losses outweigh the power gains. At high rpms, where horsepower predominates, large pipes are an advantage.
Larger pipes are good for higher rpms. Smaller pipes are good for lower rpms. Backpressure is not good.
H pipes, X pipes, and expansion plenums are too New School for me.