Titan1027 said:
Hi all, you got the point greg. advertise a 350 watt system, that pushes what 50 into the very poor design. Like i said I love my truck, I can see me making the mods now and then the nav system goes out in 2 years and nissan is saying "sorry mr miller but you added after market electronics, and they caused your problem, that will be another $2500.00 to replace your nav system. And ixian, I dont like the thought of making lawyers rich, I just would like to see nissan step up and say, first year mastake, lets take care of the problem, had may radio replaced once for the fading, ( didnt help a bit. I did have an estimate from tweeter, to upgrade with 2 amps, new speakers up front, and a custom sub for the rear, and flat out said nothing we can do for the head unit. ohhhh to the tune of $2800.00 But i am sure most people that thought we were getting R/F unit were decived.... I just want nissan to step up in this area.... Ray
It certainly confused me. My amp has a big "Clarion" sticker, my head unit says "Panasonic" so I don't really understand the "350 Watt Rockford - Fosgate powered" advertisement. If you look at the sticky thread reporting RRUMANER's interview with the Nissan tech, Nissan's response to this inquiry was that RF specified the design & components for the system. But the Nissan advertisement and the window sticker does not say "designed by Rockford - Fosgate" it says "350-Watt Rockford Fosgate - powered". So I think Nissan would need to demonstrate that the amp is Rockford - Fosgate. (or more correctly, the burden would be on a plaintiff to demonstrate that the system is not "350-Watt Rockford Fosgate - powered".) Now maybe Rockford Fosgate made the amp and Clarion put their sticker on it, I don't know. If it is a Clarion amp, and Nissan is saying that Rockford Fosgate specified the Clarion amp in the system, that doesn't seem like "350-Watt Rockford Fosgate - powered" to me.
I did some computer legal research on the subject of OEM car stereo systems, and pulled up an interesting case where some after-market installer sued Chrysler on an anti-trust tying theory, because Chrysler would not sell vehicles w/o any radio. The court (unfortunately IMHO) ruled in favor of Chrysler, thus entrenching the OEM practice of installing so-called "Premium" sound systems, such as the RF in the Titan, without allowing the consumer the option of going with no radio and getting a stereo after market.
If you check out the stock RF system descriptions of the Titans at the cardomain pages (
www.cardomain.com - search rides - Nissan Titan), you will find several others that describe all of the components as "Rockford-Fosgate" indicating that many people were confused. I would place the people that post at the cardomain pages in the aficianado category, meaning that they would be more sophisticated, and thus harder to confuse, than the average consumer. So I think the confusion aspect would be easy to prove, leaving only the literal falsity issue in question.
If push comes to shove, I don't think they could substantiate a denial of a NAV warranty claim under the Mag-Moss act, based upon mods downstream from the head unit, unless they can show that such mods caused the NAV failure. But, yes, as a practical matter, the dealer might give you a hassle, requiring a few years of litigation.
Yes, I can see $2,800 if you go to a shop, but I think you could DIY for alot less and get an enormous improvement. (Obviously that neglects to consider any $ value for your time, which you would need to regard as a hobby.)
Oh, I kind of like the thought of making lawyers rich, or at least one of them. :jester: