Why you are resisting the fact that technology is advancing and you are behind the times.
You’re claiming that I maybe wrong or at least implying some doubt. Well that’s fine with me, but the damage of passing on outdated info hurts everyone else.
That's EXACTLY what I'm getting at...I think that your test is NOT the same as gutting your cats (what this thread is actually about!!!).
Letting the sensor hang in open air...OF COURSE it's gonna read full-on lean (if and when the secondary O2 is referenced), and richen things up.
So if it reads full lean (atmosphere), then yeah..it'll run super rich, as you claimed.
So I'll concede that you are 100% correct given the scenario you described (sensors hanging). I never said you were wrong about that.
What I said was that when the sensor is installed, but there's no cat in front of it...then it's NOT going to do what you said, and you've shown NO evidence otherwise.
...
....and I have to laugh - "I'm resisting technology and behind the times." Rather than answer the question I posed, you go for "look everyone, he doesn't understand the technology here".
You claimed the second set of sensors are for diagnostic purpose ONLY, useless for A/F monitoring and will not influence the tuning. I clearly provided firsthand knowledge showing a step by step procedure for doing a simple test to show how the heated oxygen sensors can change the AFR and I also provided data that supports the procedure. If you have the burning desire to understand more, you will need to catch up by testing it for yourself. It appears your ego has been hurt and your attempt to build it back up is blocking your ability to understand this logically. For you to make a statement like “If the sensor isn't screwed in, I don't think it's grounded (electrically).” Is a perfect example that you are either lazy or you need help with your ability to use and understand the Nissan Service Manual. With all those years of experiences I would think that it’s ego building and laziness.
There's no ego attached to my post. I could care less if I turn out to be wrong. However, I'm not.
Lets clear up a few things.
I can read an FSM, just like you. Yes, I was lazy in not checking to see if the sensor ground was the exhaust. That does not make my argument any less valid...ad I'll repeat it here, so it doesn't get ignored again:
Letting the secondary O2 sensors hang in open air is NOT the same as having them in place, but with no cat before them.
That's my whole argument, and you have yet to prove ANYTHING with respect to that.
And to prove my ability to read an FSM, here's yet ANOTHER piece of evidence that under NORMAL CONDITIONS, the secondary O2's are ignored:
Do you see the 2nd O2's listed there as a possible cause for a overly rich condition? No.
When everything is operating correctly and under normal conditions there is no need for the ECU to make any additional adjustments to the AFR from the secondary sensor. I’m not saying that there isn’t fine tuning going on. That never stops. Under abnormal conditions like for instance a faulty AFR sensor or an ethanol mix additional adjustments would be necessary. The ECU is programmed to perform many checks and balances to insure proper operation and safety procedures to avoid catastrophic failure...
...and here, you agree COMPLETELY with my argument!
...
I'll be glad to discuss this as long as you like, no ego involved...and I'd appreciate if you kept it on topic, rather than playing amateur-psych and deciding for everyone that I'm "behind the times" (whatever that has to do with this argument????).
- Brian